Loading…

Davis v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Davis v. State

2016 Del. LEXIS 41 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Jan 28, 2016

Full text

David C. DAVIS, Below v. STATE of Delaware, Below

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority

GRANTED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5149157

Citations

2016 Del. LEXIS 41
132 A.3d 749
2016 WL 358965

Cited by

Baker v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Apr 6, 2023
Smith v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Jan 27, 2023
Powell v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Mar 28, 2022
Clifton v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Dec 7, 2021
Palmer v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · Jul 23, 2020
Nieves-Parrailla v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware · May 27, 2020

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Supreme Court of Delaware · Apr 11, 2018

Supreme Court of Delaware · Sep 23, 2016

Supreme Court of Delaware · Sep 22, 2016

Parentheticals

indicating that claim that Superior Court erred by denying a request for sentencing transcripts did not implicate Rule 35(a)
Powell v. State
stating that Rule 35 is not the “proper procedural vehicle” for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
Smith v. State
“The proper procedural vehicle for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is Rule 61, not Rule 35.”
Nieves-Parrailla v. State
“The proper procedural vehicle for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is Rule 61, not Rule 35.”
Baker v. State