Loading…

Colburn v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Colburn v. State

2016 Del. LEXIS 515 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Oct 5, 2016

Full text

Charles COLBURN, Below v. STATE of Delaware, Below

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority

Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Cr. ID No. 1411002179 AFFIRMED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5149722

Citations

2016 Del. LEXIS 515
148 A.3d 1172
2016 WL 5845778

Cited by

State v. Hayman-Cooper
Superior Court of Delaware · Jun 27, 2025
State v. El-Abbadi
Superior Court of Delaware · Jun 27, 2024
State v. El-Abbadi
Superior Court of Delaware · Feb 8, 2024
State v. Mujica
Superior Court of Delaware · Oct 1, 2021
State v. Mujica
Superior Court of Delaware · May 3, 2021

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

State v. Russell

Superior Court of Delaware · Jun 25, 2020

State v. Baynard

Superior Court of Delaware · Dec 5, 2019

State v. O'Neal

Superior Court of Delaware · Aug 29, 2019

State v. Rogers

Superior Court of Delaware · May 15, 2019

State v. Willis

Superior Court of Delaware · Mar 18, 2019

State v. Dillard

Superior Court of Delaware · Jan 7, 2019

State v. Dillard

Superior Court of Delaware · Jan 4, 2019

Parentheticals

Court could not find counsel’s actions unreasonable when she correctly explained legal landscape to client and followed her ethical obligations under the applicable law.
State v. Hayman-Cooper
Court could not find counsel’s actions unreasonable when she correctly explained legal landscape to client and followed her ethical obligations under both the plea entered and applicable law
State v. Dillard
Court could not find counsel’s actions unreasonable when she correctly explained legal landscape to client and followed her ethical obligations under both the plea entered and applicable law
State v. Dillard