Searcy v. State

1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2255 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 12, 1951

Full text

Searcy v. State.

Opinions in this case

Majority — Woodley
Majority — Woodley

WOODLEY, Commissioner. Appellants Joe J. Danna and Max Rud-berg are the sureties of Tennison Searcy on a bond required by a magistrate for his appearance to answer a burglary charge. Following his indictment, Tennison Sear-cy failed to appear. A judgment nisi was entered and following service, was made final. No brief has been filed by appellants following their notice of appeal, and the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. See Bell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 210. The appeal is dismissed. Opinion approved by the Court

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Woodley
Judges: Woodley
Cluster ID: 5192365

Citations

1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2255
244 S.W.2d 517

Cited by

Adams v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1959

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service