Loading…

Carador v. Sana Travel Serv — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Carador v. Sana Travel Serv

876 F.2d 890 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 26, 1989

Full text

Carador v. Sana Travel Serv

876 F.2d 890 8 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 757 Carador v. Sana Travel Serv. NO. 89-7130 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. MAY 26, 1989 Appeal From: S.D.N.Y., 700 F.Supp. 787 [1] AFFIRMED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 524382

Citations

876 F.2d 890
8 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 757
1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10488
1989 WL 64529

Cited by

Weyant v. The Phia Group LLC
S.D. New York · Aug 17, 2021

Parentheticals

“A check is not a negotiable instrument if the drawer writes on it a promise, order, obligation or power, which, when examined on its face, in any way limits the drafter’s unconditional promise to pay.”
Weyant v. The Phia Group LLC

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service