Full text
Mr. & Mrs. Floyd BROCK, Individually and as Next Friend of Rachel Brock, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Loading…
Opinion
884 F.2d 166 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 15, 1989
Full text
Mr. & Mrs. Floyd BROCK, Individually and as Next Friend of Rachel Brock, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Citations
Cited by
Fifth Circuit · May 12, 2025
S.D. Mississippi · Jan 30, 2024
Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist. · Aug 24, 2015
Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler) · Mar 13, 2015
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 18, 2015
Eighth Circuit · Jul 24, 2012
E.D. Louisiana · Aug 24, 2011
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 2010
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 2010
Supreme Court of Vermont · Jan 14, 2010
D. Colorado · Dec 7, 2008
Superior Court of Delaware · Dec 13, 2006
Parentheticals
“The cold statement that a given relationship is not ‘statistically significant’ cannot be read to mean there is no probability of a relationship.”
Reavley, J. dissenting, along with five other judges, from the denial of a motion for rehearing in banc and criticizing the majority opinion in Brock
Reavley, J. dissenting, along with five other judges, from the denial of a motion for rehearing in banc and criticizing the majority opinion in Brock