Full text
Kriscinda BESECKER, aka Chilbert v. Paul J. CHILBERT
Opinions in this case
- Majority
- Dissent — Opala
ORDER
Appellee’s motion to dismiss is denied. This appeal was timely commenced within 30 days of the filing of an order prepared in conformance with 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 696.3, 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 990A. The trial court’s March 1 ruling was not prepared in conformance with 12 O.S.Supp.1993 § 696.3, Mansell v. City of Lawton, 877 P.2d 1120 (Okl.1994).
HODGES, C.J., LAVENDER, V.C.J., and ALMA WILSON, KAUGER, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur.
SIMMS, HARGRAVE and OPALA, JJ., dissent.