Viner v. James

Patterson, J.: This is an. appeal from an order granting a motion made by the defendants to require the plaintiff to make her complaint, definite and certain. The court below held, and properly, that the remedy [543] invoked by this motion was the correct one and that the defendants were not limited to a demand for a bill of particulars. (People ex rel. Crane v. Ryder, 12 N. Y. 433.) The object of the present motion was to have the complaint, as the court below said, put in such shape that the defendants, all <.r either of them, might plead to it in such a way as might be advised for the protection of their respective rights. The action is against a number of defendants who were directors or trustees of the Anglo-American Savings and Loan Association, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of blew York. It is claimed that by reason of certain statements contained in an address of the defendantJames, one of the directors, and by reason of statements made in addresses of other of the directors at various times and in annual reports of the corporation, certain representations were made which were false and that the plaintiff acting upon them bought shares of the corporation named; and after having bought those shares, refrained from selling them in consequence of false, fraudulent and untrue statements, upon which she relied. The complaint is framed in such a way as to ask relief against all of the defendants. The indefiniteness of the complaint in respect to very substantial allegations affecting the liability of the defendants is apparent. It is not shown that at all the times therein mentioned all the defendants were directors or were connected with or could be made responsible for false representations, if such representations were made. It is true, the complaint says that at the times mentioned the defendants were directors, but it is obvious from reading the pleading that it cannot be assumed that each and every one of the defendants was a director of the corporation at each and every time referred to in the complaint. We think, therefore, the court below was right in ruling that there should be a specific allegation as to which of the defendants were directors at the respective times the alleged false reports or statements upon which the plaintiff relied were put forth; and so with relation to the times at which the plaintiff purchased her stock. It may be that such purchase was made before any of the statements or representations were put forth, which the plaintiff claims to be false; and further than that, as each defendant is sought to be made liable for his own fraudulent statement or representation, he should be connected by positive allegation with the repre [544] sentations, responsibility for which is sought to be charged upon him. ' We think the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien, McLaughlin and Laughlin, JJ., concurred. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.