Full text
In the Matter of the Application of The O. J. Gude Company, N. Y., for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against Edward S. Murphy, as Superintendent of Buildings of the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York
Opinions in this case
- Majority — Scott
- Majority — Scott
Scott, J.:
For the reasons stated in People ex rel. Wineburgh Advertising Co. v. Murphy (129 App. Div. 260), decided herewith, the order appealed from must be reversed and the motion for a peremptory mandamus granted.
Patterson, P. J., and Ingraham, J., concurred; Laughlin, J., concurred for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in City of New York v. Wineburgh Advertising Co., No. 4 (124 App. Div. 641); Clarke, J., dissented.
Order reversed, and motion for peremptory mandamus granted. Settle order on notice.