Full text
Elwood O. Roessle v. Frederick J. Lancaster
Opinions in this case
- Majority — Per curiam
- Dissent — Laughlin
Per Curiam:
The questions in this case were substantially determined on the former appeal (130 App. Div. 1). No further discussion of the case is necessary, and as the questions there indicated were presented to the jury their verdict should control. The judgment and order are, therefore, affirmed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin (dissenting), Miller and Dowling, JJ.