Full text
Nathan Shostack v. Samuel Haskell and Others, Impleaded with Rose End
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (See Shostack v. Haskell, 116 Misc. Rep. 475.) Blackmar, P J., Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Loading…
Opinion
200 A.D. 919 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1922
Full text
Nathan Shostack v. Samuel Haskell and Others, Impleaded with Rose End