Tavetian v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, because of the exclusion of evidence at folios 90, 91, 93, 95 and 96, tending to establish plaintiff’s loss of earnings, «which were a proper element of damage. (Masterton v. Village of Mount Vernon, 58 N. Y. 391; Walsh v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 204 id. 58, 68.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jayeox, Young and Kapper, JJ,, concur.