Full text
Henry S. Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, and Others, (Action No. 1.) Henry S. Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corporation, Bessie Rosenson and Others, and Others, (Action No. 2.)
Motion for reargument denied. The following phrase in the opinion* “ indexing is no part of the record ” is incorrect. (Real Prop. Law, § 316.)† The laches of the moving party, however, preclude the granting of a reargument; the reason given for failing to move in accordance with rule 19‡ being insufficient to warrant this court in disturbing the decision heretofore made. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ.
Footnotes
[*] See 230 App. Div. 410, 414.— [Rep.
[†] Amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 582.— [Rep.
[‡] See App. Div. Rules, 2d Dept, rule 19.— [Rep.