Friedman v. Neufeld

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, an invitee, in falling down an unguarded stairway leading from the basement hall of the defendant’s home to the cellar. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits at the close of plaintiff’s case reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that a question of fact is presented as to the negligence of the defendant and the plaintiff’s contributory negligence. Young, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Johnston, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm, with the following memorandum: We are of opinion that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The proof is that the hallway was so dark that plaintiff could not see, but that she was familiar with the surroundings, as the result of many previous visits. She turned off the light in the kitchen, passed through the kitchen door to the hallway and attempted to turn the switch in the hallway which controlled the hall light. The hall apparatus did not operate and she proceeded in the darkness, assuming familiarity with the surroundings. The door at the head of the cellar stairs, however, had been removed some time between the plaintiff’s previous visits to the property and the night on which she was injured. The proof is that had the plaintiff again turned on the kitchen light and left open the door leading from the kitchen to the hallway, the hallway would have been sufficiently lighted for plaintiff to see the danger of the open stairs to the cellar. (See O’ Neill v. Chatham Phenix Nat. Bank & Trust Co., 242 App. Div. 511; affd., 267 N. Y. 622.)