Shapiro v. George F. Driscoll Co.

Per Curiam.- The terms and specifications of the contract were so clear as to make it impossible as matter of law to claim that they contained an ambiguity which would justify submitting that question to a jury. Since there was no ambiguity in the contract, the conversations between the subcontractor and the architects raise no issue which should have been further litigated. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.