Full text
Norell Holding Corporation v. Sidney Putter, Doing Business under the Name of Putter Brothers, and Sidney Putter
Appeal by defendant Sidney Putter from that part of an order, entered on reargument, which denied as to him a motion made by defendants to vacate a money judgment theretofore rendered against them in the Justice’s Court of the Town of Hempstead, County of Nassau. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The Supreme Court was without power to entertain the application.
(Daniels v. Southard, 36 App. Div. 540; Johnson v. Manning, 75 App. Div. 285; Garges Bros., Inc., v. Specht, 241 App. Div. 737; Quackenbush v. Johnston, 249 App. Div. 452.) Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ., concur.
