Full text
Julia Kibiuk, Appellant-Respondent v. Windsor Residences, Inc., and Dry Dock Savings Institution
Memorandum Per Curiam.
Plaintiff’s proofs do not fully sustain her alleged cause of action.
On appeal by defendant Windsor Besidences, Inc., the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to said appellant to abide the event.
Appeal from the order should be dismissed.
On plaintiff’s appeal the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.*
Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Footnotes
[*] See, also, Rufo v. South Brooklyn Sav. Bank, 268 App. Div. 1057, and cf. McCabe v. Cohen, 268 App. Div. 1064.— [Rep.