Wilson v. Spring Hill Quartz-Mining Co.

10 Cal. 445 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

Full text

WILSON v. SPRING HILL QUARTZ-MINING COMPANY, AND GRIFFITH v. SPRING HILL QUARTZ-MINING COMPANY

Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court Terry, C. J., concurring. These cases only differ from the case of Rowe v. The Table Mountain Water Company in this, that here the complaint is against a trading company, and the service of the summons is returned executed upon the company, by service upon one Pendleton, one of the partners and associates. The principle applicable to the two classes of cases is not materially different. Judgment affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Baldwin
Judges: Baldwin
Cluster ID: 5591512

Citations

10 Cal. 445

Cited by

Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1957
Michels v. Stork
Michigan Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1883

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service