Harvey v. Ward

By the Court: 1. We think that the findings of the Court are sustained by the evidence. 2. There was no error in overruling the objection to the introduction of the judgment roll in the action of Harvey v. Finch. The objection taken was that the roll was “irrelevant, immaterial and not pertinent to any issue in this case.” The judgment roll was admissible as evidence tending to prove the indebtedness of Finch to the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.