Shuffleton v. Hill

By the COURT. We are of opinion that, under the contract and lease, Greenlaw, in the first instance, and Hill, as [474] his successor, owned the logs until delivery in the boom at the mill. Such being the case, plaintiff was entitled to an enforcement of his lien, irrespective of advances made by Vance to Hill. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to enter judgment for plaintiff.