Loading…

Birdsall v. Taylor — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Birdsall v. Taylor

1 How. Pr. 89 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1845

Full text

Ausburn Birdsall, assignee, &c. v. Nathan Taylor

Nelson, Chief Justice. The service does not appear to come within the rule. Decision.—Motion denied with costs, without prejudice.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Nelson
Judges: Nelson
Cluster ID: 5621777

Citations

1 How. Pr. 89

Cited by

Rosenthal v. Maletz
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 8, 1948

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service