Loading…

Swift v. Wells — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Swift v. Wells

2 How. Pr. 79 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1846

Full text

William P. Swift agt. David L. Wells

Brojstsoh, Chief Justice. Denied the motion, on the ground that one bill of goods, containing fifty different items, delivered at the same time, was in fact but one item.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Brojstsoh
Judges: Brojstsoh
Cluster ID: 5622039

Citations

2 How. Pr. 79

Cited by

Cassidy v. . McFarland
New York Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1893
Van Orden v. Tilden
New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 28, 1885
Druse v. Horter
Wisconsin Supreme Court · May 31, 1883
McMartin v. Bingham
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 11, 1869
Batchelor v. Albany City Insurance
The Superior Court of New York City · May 15, 1869

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service