Full text
Juhel against Rhinelander
The Court (Benson, J
dissenting) said, that they considered the decision, in the case of Seton, Maitland & Co. v. Low, as conclusive, and that the plaintiff' was entitled to judgment accordingly. r
Judgment for the plaintiff.(b)
Footnotes
[b] (b) Affirmed in the court of errors, in 1802, infra, 487.