Full text
Julius Fortsmann v. Ruth A. Shulting, Administratrix
Opinions in this case
- Majority — Per curiam
- Majority
The following is the mem. handed down:
“ The notice of the order and its entry did not show by indorsement or otherwise the office address or place of business of the attorney serving it, and was, therefore, ineffectual to limit the time of appeal. (Kelly v. Sheehan, 76 N. Y. 325 ; Bockes v. Hathorn, 78 id. 222.)
“ The motion to dismiss the appeal should, therefore, be denied, but without costs.”
Per Curiam mem.
for denial of motion.
All concur.
Motion denied.