Loading…

Bliss v. Sickles — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Bliss v. Sickles

59 N.Y. St. Rep. 168 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1894

Full text

Cornelius N. Bliss v. Daniel E. Sickles

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority
Majority — Andrews

Andrews, Ch. J., reads for affirmance. All concur. Judgment affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5634107

Citations

59 N.Y. St. Rep. 168
142 N.Y. 647
1894 N.Y. LEXIS 849
36 N.E. 1064

Cited by

In re Kohler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 6, 1934
In re Liebig
Second Circuit · Nov 13, 1918
Davis v. Louisville Trust Co.
Sixth Circuit · Jul 13, 1910
Tindle v. . Birkett
New York Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1902
Converse v. Sickles
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 20, 1897
Humphrey v. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jul 1, 1896

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service