Loading…

Cornell v. Maltby — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Cornell v. Maltby

166 N.Y. 614 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1901

Full text

Amelia Cornell, as Successor in Interest of Prudence Carr v. Jerome B. Maltby, Impleaded with Others

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 165 N Y. 557.)

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5634358

Citations

166 N.Y. 614
1901 N.Y. LEXIS 1356
59 N.E. 900

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service