Loading…

Noble v. Kendall — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Noble v. Kendall

226 N.Y. 559 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1919

Full text

Harriet E. Noble v. William B. Kendall, as Surviving Partner of the Firm of Kendall & Whitlock, Impleaded with Others

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 225 N. Y. 673.)

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5635089

Citations

226 N.Y. 559
1919 N.Y. LEXIS 903
123 N.E. 864

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service