Loading…

Claim of Reid v. Rose — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Claim of Reid v. Rose

306 N.Y. 880 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1954

Full text

In the Matter of the Claim of Marcellus Reid, against Philip Rose, Workmen's Compensation Board

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Feoessel and Van Voobhis, JJ.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5637592

Citations

306 N.Y. 880
1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1201
119 N.E.2d 588

Cited by

Claim of Gallo v. Scofield
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Mar 13, 1963
Denman v. Many & Zanetti
New York Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1960
Claim of Smith v. White
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 10, 1957

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service