Loading…

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Mirvish v. Mott

947 N.Y.S.2d 49 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2012

Full text

David Mirvish v. Hanno D. Mott, Individually and as of Yulla H. Lipchitz

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority

[876] Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements [see 18 NY3d 510 (2012)].

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5641600

Citations

947 N.Y.S.2d 49
2012 NY Slip Op 75123
2012 N.Y. LEXIS 1267
19 N.Y.3d 875
969 N.E.2d 1164
2012 WL 1988434

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Mirvish v. Mott — freecase.ai