Loading…

Plotch v. Citibank, N.A. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Plotch v. Citibank, N.A.

38 N.Y.S.3d 513 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 2016

Full text

Adam Plotch v. Citibank, N.A.

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements [see 27 NY3d 477 (2016)]. Judge Garcia taking no part.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Garcia
Cluster ID: 5645503

Citations

38 N.Y.S.3d 513
2016 NY Slip Op 84854
2016 N.Y. LEXIS 2736
28 N.Y.3d 945
60 N.E.3d 408
2016 WL 4691782

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service