Roosevelt Hospital v. New York El. R.

Van Brunt, P. J. Upon an examination of the questions raised upon this appeal, we do not see any that have not been disposed of by this court adversely to the appellants. The ease of Peyton v. Railway Co., (Sup.) 17 N. Y. Supp. 244, relied upon by the counsel for the appellants, is clearly distinguishable from the case at bar. The j udgment should be affirmed, with costs.