Loading…

Riemer v. Riemer — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Riemer v. Riemer

340 N.Y.S.2d 185 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1972

Full text

Bernice Riemer v. David Riemer

no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitbl, Jasen and Gibson.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5679684

Citations

340 N.Y.S.2d 185
1972 N.Y. LEXIS 929
31 N.Y.2d 881
292 N.E.2d 320

Cited by

Legurnic v. Ciccone
E.D. New York · Nov 25, 2014
Excelsior Capital LLC v. Allen
Second Circuit · Sep 6, 2013
Alternative Electrodes, LLC v. Empi, Inc.
E.D. New York · Feb 4, 2009
Colavito v. New York Organ Donor Network, Inc.
Second Circuit · Feb 23, 2006
Fine v. Fine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Feb 21, 2006
Astor Holdings, Inc. v. Roski
S.D. New York · Aug 12, 2003
Mina Investment Holdings Ltd. v. Lefkowitz
S.D. New York · Jan 20, 1999
Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.
D. Rhode Island · Sep 29, 1998
Michele Pommier Models, Inc. v. Men Women NY Model Management, Inc.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

S.D. New York · Jul 8, 1998

Action House, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Stanley Koolik, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee

Second Circuit · Apr 7, 1995

Court of Appeals of Virginia · Jun 8, 1993

International Minerals & Resources, Inc. v. Pappas

S.D. New York · Apr 19, 1991

Parentheticals

relying on Williams & Co. v. Collins, Tuttle & Co., 6 A.D.2d 302, 176 N.Y.S.2d 99, 103 (1st Dept.1958), a case involving the distinct tort of interference with prospective contract
Astor Holdings, Inc. v. Roski
“[C]ourts have required more than a showing of qualified probability that the contract would have been completed but for the tortious interference.”
Michele Pommier Models, Inc. v. Men Women NY Model Management, Inc.