Loading…

Claim of Murphy v. New York City Transit Authority — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Claim of Murphy v. New York City Transit Authority

352 N.Y.S.2d 443 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1973

Full text

In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Murphy v. New York City Transit Authority, Workmen's Compensation Board

Order affirmed, .without costs; no opimon. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bueke, Breitel, Jasen,. Gtabrielli, Jones and Wachtleb.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5680353

Citations

352 N.Y.S.2d 443
1973 N.Y. LEXIS 900
33 N.Y.2d 878
307 N.E.2d 560

Cited by

Claim of Neacosia v. New York Power Authority
New York Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1995
Lemon v. NYC TR. AUTH.
New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1988
Claim of Lemon v. New York City Transit Authority
New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1988

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service