Loading…

Meyer v. Gehl Co. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Meyer v. Gehl Co.

368 N.Y.S.2d 834 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1975

Full text

Christopher A. Meyer, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Allen L. Meyer v. Gehl Company

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Fuchsberg

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Cooke. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse in the following opinion.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Fuchsberg
Cluster ID: 5681276

Citations

368 N.Y.S.2d 834
1975 N.Y. LEXIS 1801
36 N.Y.2d 760
329 N.E.2d 666

Cited by

Kerr v. Koemm
S.D. New York · Feb 8, 1983
Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.
New York Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1980
Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day
Alaska Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1979
Meyer v. Droms
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Mar 1, 1979

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Copart Industries, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1977

Cotroneo v. Sabatino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Dec 12, 1975

Parish v. Henneberry Road Farms, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jul 18, 1975

Parentheticals

“the manufacturer was under no duty to foresee that a child of tender years ... would have been present in and endangered by the type of farm machine involved”
Kerr v. Koemm
dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Fuchsberg
Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day