Loading…

Zeiderman & Edelstein, P. C. v. Rich — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Zeiderman & Edelstein, P. C. v. Rich

419 N.Y.S.2d 970 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1979

Full text

Zeiderman & Edelstein, P. C. v. Buddy Rich

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (61 AD2d 922). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5683690

Citations

419 N.Y.S.2d 970
1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2199
47 N.Y.2d 948
393 N.E.2d 1042

Cited by

Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Lelakis
S.D. New York · Sep 19, 1996
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Kuang Hsung Chuang
S.D. New York · May 9, 1988

Parentheticals

adopting the dissent of the Appellate Division
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Kuang Hsung Chuang

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service