Opinion

Town of Aurora v. Kranz

483 N.Y.S.2d 1012 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1984

Full text

Town of Aurora v. Thomas S. Kranz

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (103 AD2d 1022), noting that the factual determinations of that court more nearly comport with the weight of the evidence. [998] Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5687586

Citations

483 N.Y.S.2d 1012
1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4751
63 N.Y.2d 996
473 N.E.2d 262

Cited by

HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 2017
Town of Avon v. Oliver
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · Mar 21, 2002
Berger v. Manhattan Life Insurance
S.D. New York · Nov 6, 1992
Rotter v. Coconino County
Arizona Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1991

Parentheticals

Under standard mortgage clause, insurer is required to first make payment to mortgagee to extent of its interest in the property, and then to pay balance of loss, if any, to mortgagor so long as mortgagor has not breached any conditions of the policy.
HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.