Loading…

Langdon v. Mohr — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Langdon v. Mohr

486 N.Y.S.2d 938 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1985

Full text

Victoria M. Langdon v. Robert E. Mohr

[821] OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (99 AD2d 957). Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 5687739

Citations

486 N.Y.S.2d 938
1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14164
64 N.Y.2d 819
476 N.E.2d 337

Cited by

Matter of Gonos v. Hadzipetros
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 20, 2016
Matter of Renaldo R. v. Chanice R.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Sep 29, 2015
Steele v. Rose
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Oct 2, 2003
Sass v. Sass
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Nov 20, 2000

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service