Opinion

Jemison v. Crichlow

544 N.Y.S.2d 813 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1989

Full text

Marie R. Jemison, Individually and on Behalf of Marie S. Jemison and Others v. Grantley E. Crichlow, Individually, as a Licensed Process Server and as a City Marshal

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. We agree with so much of the opinion of Justice Lawrence J. Bracken at the Appellate Division (139 AD2d 332) that [728] holds that actions against the City Marshal for acts done in an official capacity or by omission of an official duty and based on common law must be instituted within the one-year period provided by CPLR 215 (1). Plaintiff’s cause of action based upon 42 USC § 1983 is not before us. Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum. Order affirmed, etc. [See, 74 NY2d 828.]

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Sep 2, 1999

Ruddy v. Citibank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Feb 13, 1996

Marino v. Perna

Civil Court of the City of New York · May 24, 1995

Marine Midland Bank N. A. v. Renck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Oct 17, 1994

Ferran v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 17, 1993

Mannix Industries, Inc. v. Antonucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Mar 8, 1993

Rivera v. Wyckoff Heights Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 8, 1992

Clay v. ILC Data Device Corp.

E.D. New York · Aug 27, 1991

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.