Lamb & Mathis v. Radcliff

By the Court. Lumpkin, J., delivering the opinion. We are unable to distinguish this, from, the cases of Norton vs. Cobb, (20 Ga. Rep., 44,) and Watkins vs. Jenks & Ogden, (24 Ga. Rep., 431). This transfer, like the two in those cases, is an. assignment in trust to a certain preferred creditor by an insolvent debtor; the very thing prohibited by the act of 1818. Judgment affirmed. Judge Stephens absent, on account of the illness of one of his children.