Fla. Cen. & Pen. R. R. v. Hays

Lumpkin, J. The questions -of law presented in this case have been -settled by repeated adjudications of this court; following the doctrine laid down in the case of Harris v. Central Railroad, 78 Ga. 525, the allowance of the amendment to the declaration was proper; the trial judge committed no error, and the evidence warranted the verdict. Judgment affirmed.