Douglas Planing Mill & Novelty Co. v. Anderson

Lumpkin, J. Evidence that a named person, “manager for the plaintiff” (a corporation), owed the defendant a specified amount, for which such defendant set up a counter-claim by plea, of set-off, did not prove an in-' debtedness by the corporation or authorize a verdict to be directed ■ against it therefor. Judgment reversed. ■All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent. Complaint. Before Judge O’Steen. Douglas superior court. November 23, 1905. Lankford & Dickerson, for plaintiff.