Wills Valley Coal & Iron Co. v. Lumpkin

Beck, J. In several of the extracts from the charge to the jury, which were criticised in the motion for a new trial, there are palpable inaccuracies; but the instructions which the court gave upon the controlling issues in the case were substantially correct; and there being evi [617] dence to support tlie verdict, this court will not interfere with the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial. • March 13, 1917. Equitable petition. Before Judge Eite. Dade superior court. July 34, 1916. Payne & Hale, for plaintiff in error. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.