Lime Cola Bottling Co. v. Harris Tire Co.

Luke, J. There was no error in overruling the demurrer, or in the admission of testimony. The evidence in this ease, which was tried according to law, supported, if it did not demand, the verdict returned for the plaintiff. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed. Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.