Lusk v. State

Bloodworth, J. The court properly admitted, the evidence referred to in the only special ground of the motion for a new trial; the evidence amply supported the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and, no error of law appearing, the motion for a new trial was properly overruled. Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Clay & Blair, for plaintiff in error. John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general pro tem., contra.