Rauschenberg v. Peeples

Bell, J. Applying the principles announced in the headnotes, there was no error in sustaining the demurrer to the part of the amendment set forth in the statement of the facts. It follows that none of the rulings or charges were erroneous for any of the reasons assigned. The general grounds of the motion are not referred to in the brief, and therefore are treated as abandoned. Judgment affirmed. Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.