Pee Curiam.
This case is controlled by that of Gody v. Automobile Financing Inc., 37 Ga. App. 452 (140 S. E. 634) ; and tinder the rulings there made, the court in the instant case erred in admitting the evidence which directly contradicted the express provisions of the written contract. See also Hadden v. Williams, 37 Ga. App. 464 (140 S. E. 797).
Judgment reversed.
Broyles, G, J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. ■ Luhe, J., dissents.

Loading…