Southern Railway Co. v. Crow

Bloodwortii, J. The evidence was in conflict, “but the issues were for the jury, and there being evidence to authorize their verdict, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds only.” Western & Atlantic Railroad Co. v. Barnett, 20 Ga. App. 616 (2) (93 S. E. 260); see Allen v. State, 37 Ga. App. 94 (139 S. E. 95); Perkins v. Attaway, 14 Ga. 28 (9). Judgment affirmed. Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.