Opinion

Braddy v. State

1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 555 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · May 14, 1929

Full text

Braddy v. State

Opinions in this case

Majority — Bloodwobth
On rehearing

Bloodwobth, J. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge, and consequently will not be considered. The State made out a case, and the defendant introduced no evidence and made no statement. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed. Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.