Opinion

Bluestein v. State

50 Ga. App. 580 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Dec 17, 1934

Full text

BLUESTEIN v. State

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Broyles
On rehearing

Per Curiam. The accused was convicted of arson, and his motion for a new trial contained the general grounds only. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to establish the corpus delicti, and to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of the guilt of the defendant. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error. Judgment affirmed. MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.