Opinion

Barnett v. Moss

98 Ga. App. 581 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Nov 7, 1958

Full text

BARNETT v. MOSS

Gardner, Presiding Judge. Pending this cause, the parties agreed upon a compromise settlement which has been signed by counsel for all parties concerned and filed in this court. In order to carry out this settlement agreement it is necessary to have the cause remanded that the .agreed verdict may be taken. In view of the consent settlement filed with this court by consent of counsel for all parties, this court has authority, without looking into the record, to reverse the judgment to carry out said compromise agreement, and is hereby reversing it on this premise. Judgment reversed. Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur. Greene, Neely, Buckley & De Bieux, for plaintiff in error. G. Seals Aiken, Arthur G. Withers, contra.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author: Gardner
Judges: Gardner
Cluster ID: 5776484

Citations

98 Ga. App. 581
1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 633
106 S.E.2d 60

Cited by

MERITAGE HOMES OF GEORGIA, INC. v. BILLY JONES
Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 21, 2024
Francis Clouthier v. the Medical Center of Central Georgia, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 15, 2021
Norton v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jan 7, 1972
Petty v. Petty
Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 22, 1971

Parentheticals

“In view of the consent settlement filed with this court by consent of counsel for all parties, this court has authority, without looking into the record, to reverse the judgment to carry out said compromise agreement[.]”
MERITAGE HOMES OF GEORGIA, INC. v. BILLY JONES
reversing for the parties “to carry out [their] compromise agreement”
Francis Clouthier v. the Medical Center of Central Georgia, Inc.
reversing for the parties “to carry out [their] compromise agreement”
MERITAGE HOMES OF GEORGIA, INC. v. BILLY JONES