Schallern v. Stanco

130 Ga. App. 687 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jan 29, 1974

Full text

VAN SCHALLERN v. STANCO

Eberhardt, Presiding Judge. A garnishment was instituted on a dispossessory warrant, served on Decatur Federal Savings & Loan Association, with which the defendant had a savings account in excess of the claimed delinquent rent. Defendant filed a bond to dissolve the garnishment and moved that it be dissolved. The motion was denied and the denial was entered August 24, 1973. Within ten days and on August 31, 1973 a certificate of appealability was granted to defendant, but the certificate was not filed with the clerk of the trial court until September 4, 1973, which is more than 10 days after the entry of the nonfinal or interlocutory judgment from which this appeal was entered. Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175 (200 SE2d 748), a certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i. e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from. Consequently, this appeal must be dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Pannell and Evans, JJ., concur.

Parentheticals

“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
American Alternative Insurance Corporation v. James Lawrence Bennett
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Joan Wilkerson, Next of Kin and of the Estate of Harrell Wilkerson Jr. v. Augusta Hospital D/B/A as Trinity Hospital
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Lisa Ann Peluso v. Joseph Gustave Peluso, III
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Steven J. Sabino v. Joseph R. Sabino
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Traffic Calming USA, LLC v. Commerce and Industry Insurance Co.
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Tina Key v. Melissa Renee
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Samuel Prior v. State
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Kenneth Harold Jackson v. State
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Joseph Albert Parker v. State
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Bank of America, N.A. v. Parts Central, Inc.
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Children's World Learning Center, LLC. v. Brandice Carter
“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”
Riley Hadfield v. State

Schallern v. Stanco — freecase.ai